CRS v2 to v3 change explorer
The seventeen changes between Schema 2.0 and the amended CRS, filtered by institution type.
Open the explorer →Which package is current, which is superseded, and which one your authority actually accepts for the reporting year. Four regimes, four release trains, and no single official page that lists them together.
Schema packages are published by the OECD and by the European Commission, and they move on their own cadence: a user guide can be revised without the schema version changing, and a status message schema can be reissued while the reporting schema stays put. The version you need is therefore a fact about a moment in time, not a file to keep a copy of.
We deliberately do not mirror the packages here. A copy hosted by a vendor becomes the apparent version of record for files that vendor does not control, and a stale copy validated against is worse than no copy at all. Every row below links to the publisher.
| Package | Schema | User guide | Published | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRS — legacy | 2.0 | 3.0 | June 2019 | Current pre-amendment baseline. Still the operative package for exchanges until the amended standard takes effect. |
| CRS — amended | 3.0 | 4.0 | October 2024 | Supports amended CRS reporting. First exchanges expected to commence in 2027; the version attribute on the root element must read 3.0. |
| CRS status message | 2.0 | 3.0 | June 2025 | Carries the authority’s response to a submission. Supersedes the 2019 status message package. |
| CARF | 1.5 | 2.0 | July 2025 | Revises the guide first published in 2024. Separate XML standard from CRS; not a CRS profile. |
| CARF status message | Published | Published | June 2025 | The CARF equivalent of the CRS status message package. |
| DAC8 | — | — | Directive (EU) 2023/2226 | EU implementation of CARF-style rules, applying from 1 January 2026. Substantive rules are set at Union level; filing mechanics remain Member State specific. |
Two rows are easy to misread. The legacy CRS package is not withdrawn — it remains the operative one until the amended standard applies to you, so both versions are live facts at the same time. And DAC8 has no schema row of its own: it is a directive, and the technical format for domestic filing is determined nationally.
Every package carries two numbers, and they move independently.
A firm that tracks only the schema number will miss guide revisions that change how an existing element should be populated. Those revisions do not break validation, which is precisely why they are missed: the file passes and the content is wrong.
Three checks, in this order, before any submission:
Primary instruments only. Each is named in full so the reference remains traceable even if a link moves.
REGREP is an independent software provider. This record explains a reporting framework in plain language and is not legal, tax or regulatory advice. Confirm scope, thresholds and submission dates with your competent authority before you file.
What changes between the versions, and what happens when a file meets the schema.
The seventeen changes between Schema 2.0 and the amended CRS, filtered by institution type.
Open the explorer →What each layer of validation catches, and why a schema-valid file can still be rejected.
Read the guide →How a correction references the original, and why the reference architecture outlives the schema version.
Read the guide →Create a free account and generate against the package your authority accepts for the period you are filing.