MiCA reporting requirements
The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation brings crypto-asset service providers and token issuers into a single EU authorisation and supervisory regime — with recurring supervisory reporting and structured whitepaper obligations attached.
REGREP is an independent software provider. This page explains the framework in plain language and is not legal or regulatory advice — confirm scope and timing with your competent authority.
- Instrument
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1114
- Scope
- Crypto-asset service providers and token issuers
- Reporting artefacts
- Supervisory reports · whitepapers
- Format
- EBA and ESMA reporting formats · iXBRL for whitepapers
- Supervisor
- National competent authority
- Penalties
- Administrative measures and sanctions set by each member state
What MiCA asks of you
The short version: what the framework requires, who it applies to and when it bites.
What it requires
Authorised providers report on their crypto-asset activity to their supervisor. Issuers of asset-referenced and e-money tokens carry additional reserve and prudential reporting.
Who it applies to
Crypto-asset service providers authorised in the EU, and issuers of asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens offering them in the EU.
When it applies
MiCA's provisions for service providers have applied since December 2024, with token issuer rules from mid-2024. Reporting runs on the cycle your competent authority sets.
What has to be done
Penalty powers derive from Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 as applied through national transposition.
| Obligation | What it means in practice |
|---|---|
| Report supervisory returns | Submit periodic returns on activity, clients and holdings in the format your competent authority collects. |
| Issuer reserve reporting | Issuers of asset-referenced and e-money tokens report on reserve assets and the prudential position backing tokens in issue. |
| Publish a compliant whitepaper | Whitepapers must carry the prescribed content and, where required, be delivered in a structured, machine-readable form. |
| Keep identifiers and data consistent | Entity and instrument identifiers must resolve consistently across returns, and validation errors are corrected before filing. |
| Notify material changes | Changes to the business, the token or the reserve are reflected in the next return and notified where the regime requires it. |
From your data to a validated filing
Activate only the module the obligation needs. Every price covers one regulated entity unless stated otherwise, and excludes VAT.
MiCA Supervisory Reporting
Map your activity and holdings data to the supervisory templates, validate against the framework, and produce the filing package.
€1,500/year1 regulated entity · 1 free test report per quarter Create free account →CARF / DAC8
The tax transparency side of crypto: user due diligence data turned into validated CARF and DAC8 XML for automatic exchange.
€1,000/yearUp to 10,000 records per year · 1 regulated entity Create free account →Whitepaper iXBRL tagging
Structured tagging of a MiCA whitepaper into an iXBRL package, delivered as a scoped engagement.
Talk to usScoped per whitepaper Talk to usRelated to MiCA
Reporting as an authorised CASP
What a crypto-asset service provider files, to whom, and how the supervisory and tax obligations sit together.
Read use case →Digital assets guide
Plain-language explainers on MiCA, CARF and DAC8 for crypto-asset businesses.
Read the guide →MiCA Supervisory module
See how the module maps, validates and packages MiCA supervisory reports.
See the module →Questions, answered
Does MiCA reporting replace my tax reporting?
What does the MiCA free tier include?
How much does MiCA supervisory reporting cost?
Do you handle whitepaper tagging?
Prove your MiCA data before the deadline.
Create a free account and run a test report on your own activity data today.