Crypto-asset firms in the European Union now carry two distinct reporting duties that arrived from different directions. The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation makes supervision routine: authorised service providers and token issuers submit structured returns to their national competent authority, and issuers publish a whitepaper in a machine-readable format rather than a document nobody can parse. Separately, the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework and the directive that implements it in the European Union bring crypto transactions into the same automatic exchange of information model that already covers financial accounts.
The two regimes ask different questions of the same business. Supervisory reporting is about the firm: activity volumes, the assets it handles, its own position. Exchange reporting is about the customer: who they are, where they are resident, and what they transacted. Firms that treat them as one project usually discover the data models do not overlap as much as expected, and that customer due diligence records are the constraint on both.
This pillar collects what the REGREP Regulatory Team publishes across both — practitioner guides, the questions we are asked repeatedly, and reference material on schemas, templates and transaction mappings. Every record cites at least one official source, the regulation, technical standard or authority guidance it rests on, and carries the date it was last reviewed. Template and schema revisions are tracked as immutable versions, so a guide written against one version says so.
Nothing here is legal, tax or regulatory advice, and both the templates and the submission channels differ by national competent authority. Confirm the current version and channel with your authority before you file. When you are ready to produce the return or the exchange file rather than read about it, each obligation maps to a REGREP module.
